In turn, the agenda of enlargement emerged since 1993, and, therefore, more than 75 million people have migrated to the EU, and addition of twelve languages and political systems. The last logic is based on the fact that EU needs a geopolitical reconfiguration due to its ever-larger entity.ĭelanty (2006) concludes that until now, Europeanisation has been shaped by several factors. Besides, other reasons for Europeanisation is the cultural process of construction which involves articulation of expression of collective identity. The second logic is based on the fact that EU is known for transnational polity, hence, it would become a transnationalisation of the state. Europeanisation is based on some logics such as post-national development which involves formation of societies in a cosmopolitan direction. In the same setting, the author feels that EU enlargement to south and east will lead to a difficulty in sustaining the existing modernist projects of Westernisation.īesides, Delanty (2006) thinks that the inclusion of central and Eastern Europe, Turkey, Russia and Baltic states will lead to misunderstanding of Europe as a social, cultural and geopolitical space based on the same identity. In the Civilisational Consequences of Enlargement, Delanty (2006) identifies that in the context of thinking about enlargement of EU, the perspectives from different authors and people show that in the direction that Europe is an intermediate process of becoming. The chapter reveals a broader perspective of history that Delanty (2006) among others use to get a differentiated picture of civilisational in the modernity. According to Delanty (2002), the enlargement of EU is one of the most significant factors, however, it should not be misunderstood that the enlargement is likely to shape or enforce the current situation. However, their findings explain that a unified Europe will settle conflicts from political, religious, cultural and economic backgrounds and foster free trade, economic globalisation among other anticipated positive impacts such as social relations, immigration and cultural diversity.ĭelanty states that the contemporary project of Europeanisation must be paced in a wider perspective of modernity to experience different versions of civilisations. For instance, while Delanty (2006) feels that enlargement may de-Westernise the Europe and make it less Americanisation, Habermas (2001) proposes that the Europe need one constitution as it is the case with the U.K and America. Each author gives personal views on the effects of enlargement. ![]() In particular, Habermas (2001) and Delanty (2006) differ in some of their reasoning for Europe enlargement. In addition, economic explanations back up reasoning for unified Europe as one of the safest ways to welfare and economic growth. Several authors have investigated the matter and the general finding is that Europeanisation and Europe enlargement was introduced following immediate political goal and irreversible decisions. The meaning of Europe is defined by several metrics such as Easter enlargement of the European Union (EU).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |